![]() ![]() Within the next few weeks, the Committee on Climate Change, the statutory advisory body to the government on the climate crisis, will deliver its verdict on whether new exploration and exploitation in the North Sea can be compatible with the UK’s carbon budgets. The paper, from UCL scientists and commissioned by the campaign group Uplift, says: “The development of new UK oil and gas fields are not compatible with limiting warming in line with the Paris agreement … We recommend a moratorium be placed on all new oil and gas fields and the government focus its efforts on supporting the transition to a low carbon economy, both domestically and internationally.” “For the UK to produce more oil and gas, another oil producer would need to keep their oil and gas in the ground.” “There is no need for new oil and gas fields in the UK,” he told the Guardian. petroleum companies are still investing heavily in fossil fuel production while talking up what are often small efforts on climate change.Daniel Welsby, a research fellow at UCL and co-author of a research note seen by the Guardian on the UK’s potential new licences, said for the government to justify licensing new fossil fuels, ministers would have to be able to persuade other countries to reduce their production. But environmental groups say many major U.S. The American Petroleum Institute, a trade association representing the oil and gas industry, said restricting oil and gas production would “jeopardize America’s economic recovery,” increase energy costs, eliminate jobs and shift energy production oversees.Ī statement from Scott Parker, the organization’s content and rapid response manager, did not specifically criticize Biden and said neither candidate put forth realistic solutions to address the threat of climate change.Įuropean oil giants in particular, like Royal Dutch Shell and BP, are investing in solar and wind energy, minimizing their financial risks if oil rigs go the way of coal-fired power plants in Western countries. We need an all-of-the-above energy approach that’s consumer friendly, values energy independence and protects OK jobs,” she wrote. “We must stand up for our oil and gas industry. Kendra Horn, an Oklahoma Democrat who flipped a Republican seat in 2018, tweeted that she disagreed with him. Still, Biden’s comments could add headaches for Democrats in oil-heavy states. National polling shows growing skepticism of fracking. In the suburbs that might be key to a Trump path to victory, Pennsylvania voters have shown opposition to the drilling and the massive pipelines required to move its product across the state. ![]() ![]() The state says the oil and gas sector employs about 26,000 workers there.īut it’s not clear yet how that pitch is landing, even in Pennsylvania. Trump touts his support for a sector he says brings economic benefits to rural areas and jobs to construction workers. Trump has been eager on frequent campaign trips there to cut a contrast between himself and Biden on the issue. Pennsylvania is both a leading battleground state in the presidential election and a leader in the nation’s fracking boom. Trump has sought to make hydraulic fracturing, a process of oil and natural gas extraction, a key issue in Pennsylvania, wrongly charging Biden would ban the practice.īiden says he would ban new oil and gas permits on federal land, but most of the United States’ fracking happens on private land. Polls show about three in four Americans are concerned about dangerous warming of the nation and planet.īut politically, Republicans see Biden’s comments as potentially damaging to Democrats in states that rely on the oil and gas industry. Biden says the country has a moral obligation to tackle climate change, while Trump has questioned the well-established science behind it. The back-and-forth came as the debate was coming to a close, during a segment on how the candidates would respond to climate change. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |